Skip to main content

Question 2.4.4

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

7 months ago

(a) Assume, for contradiction, that the natural numbers are bounded above. Let's also assume that this upper bound is uu. Since the natural numbers are also increasing, we then know by MCT that the sequence of natural numbers converges.

Assume that this limit is LL. By our definition of convergence, we have that for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0,

NN,nN,nN    nL<ϵ.\exists N \in \mathbb{N}, \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \quad n \geq N \implies \abs{n - L} < \epsilon.

However, if we choose ϵ=1\epsilon = 1, the application of the definition implies that

NN,nN,nN    nL<1.\exists N \in \mathbb{N}, \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \quad n \geq N \implies \abs{n - L} < 1.

which is impossible since (n+1)∉V1(L)( n + 1 ) \not\in V_{1}(L). Therefore, the natural numbers are unbounded and

xR,  nN:x<n.\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, \; \exists n \in \mathbb{N}: \quad x < n.

(b) Consider the intervals given by In=[an,bn]I_{n} = [a_{n}, b_{n}], for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}, such that

I1I2I3.I_1 \supseteq I_2 \supseteq I_3 \dots.

Notice that the sequence ana_{n} is increasing (a contradiction would arise if it were decreasing) and, likewise, the sequence bnb_{n} is decreasing. Since ana_{n} is bounded above by b1b_1 and bnb_{n} is bounded below by a1a_1, then both sequences converge.
Now, assuming that ana_{n} converges to aa and that bnb_{n} converges to bb, we can apply the Order Limit Theorem. Thus,

nN,anbn    ab.\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \quad a_{n} \leq b_{n} \implies a \leq b.

Therefore,

nNIn=[a,b].\bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} I_{n} = [a, b] \neq \emptyset.
0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 2.4.4

Navigate

Q 2.4.4